<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
  <rss version="2.0">
    <channel>

<title>Aquarius＆Libre</title>
      <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:06:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:06:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      
<item>
        <title>川久保玲大战山本耀司</title>
        <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.2166846.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[无论是Comme des Gar<font face="Arial">&ccedil;on还是Y-3我都毫无兴趣吧<br />
Marc Jacobs！<br />
帮妈妈买了Daisy帮爸爸买了MJ的包，飘洋过海又一年就这么过去了。<br />
从来对美国的牌子就有无比的好感，对这个国家有无比的信心。<br />
Well，暂别了，美利坚，I'LL BE BACK，尽管我也爱法兰西！<br />
今年回到上海之前已经拿到permission，得到一直以来崇拜的人的接见。<br />
不知道会不会被他们的光芒刺瞎呢？！<br />
所以保险起见，我还是去找一副Marc Jacobs</font>的eye wear！<br />

那好吧，五月，我们上海见！<br />
<img alt="" src="http://node0.foto.ycstatic.com/200905/07/0/27767728.jpg" />...
]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.2166846.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:05:37 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
        <title>探秘中国博客审查</title>
        <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.2129660.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[<font face="Arial"><font face="Arial"><font face="Arial"><img src="http://node3.foto.ycstatic.com/200903/31/1/27669921.jpg" alt="" /><br />
</font></font></font><br />
<br />
草泥马和河蟹的战争在不断升级，河蟹不断发展新的武器，草泥马不 断使用新的诡计。<br />
<br />
在草泥马族茅山巫师部落穿墙术不断提高的今天，河蟹那层厚厚的壳 --- &ldquo;大火墙&rdquo;以及金盾工程，已经显得越来越笨重无力。今天河蟹朝廷越来越倚重的是武功诡异绝伦的&ldquo;太监&rdquo;群体 --- 各大网络服务商的&ldquo;自我审查&rdquo;。在这一点上，河蟹再一次成为了苏俄老大哥的小兄弟：俄罗斯的网络审查强劲绝伦，而且根本不屑使用&ldquo;大火墙&rdquo;这么笨重原始的 技术，玩儿的就是黑客和自我审查。 俄罗斯的情况按下不表，今天我们来测试的是中国&ldquo;十五大太监&rdquo;各 自的葵花宝典神功修炼程度以及各自武功招数的特点。<br />
<br />
<br />
这十五大大内高手分别是：百度，博客大巴，中国博客网，凤凰播报，猫扑，MSNLIVE， MY SPACE，网易，QQ空间，新浪，搜狐，天涯，TOM，雅虎中国，和歪酷。 这项实验由香港大学新闻及传媒研究中心（JMSC）的 Rebecca MacKinnon领军，耗时10个月。她的团队花了两个月时间设计实验和计算机程序，然后在2008年2月和2008年9月之间不停的向这十五大高手出 招：用五十类不同的话题在各个网上发文章，测试各大高手的自宫程度和手法。这五十类话题包括：突发事件，台湾，农民工，非法拆迁，经济金融，西藏等等，无奇不有。 须知，这各大高手虽然受朝廷统一领导，但修行主要靠个人。几 乎每家公司都有各自开发的&ldquo;太监程序&rdquo;，有些还是业内共享的标准，所以修行程度差别很大。在实验者进行的有效的108次实验中，功力最深的公司&ldquo;太监&rdquo;了 60次，第二的太监了44次，而功力最浅的只太监了一次。<br />
<br />
由于内容敏感，实验者并没公布这些功力排名公司的名字。（一旦公布出来，那家功力最浅的公司肯定 要受被迫面壁，重新训练） 实验者试了四篇关于毒奶粉的文章。凤凰网出手最恨，四篇全灭。其次是天涯，删了两篇（其中一篇还是官方关于温总视察一个销售毒奶粉商店的报道）。 再试十篇关于西藏的，引发13大高手纷纷出手。最狠的灭了八篇。 十六篇关于奥运的（开幕式假唱，体操队员年龄等等），出手最恨的灭了八篇，有四家一篇都没灭。 什么话题能引发十五大高手一起出招呢？&ldquo;政治异见人士&rdquo;，所有人都出了手，最恨的灭了4篇。 除了出手凶狠程度不同以外，各大高手的武功招数也不同。有的高手只玩儿一首绝活，有的则花样百出。 1. 干脆发表不了。&ldquo;对不起，您的文章发表失败，文章内容包含不合适内容，请检查&rdquo;（百度）。有十一位高手怀此绝技。 2. &ldquo;您的博文已经提交，需要审核后才能显示。谢谢&rdquo;，十位高手修炼过这个。 3. 猫扑，网易，和TOM：在博文发表后，只能自己看，公众看不了。 4. 开始发表成功，随后删除。大家都见识过新浪的&ldquo;马眼小人儿&rdquo;了：&ldquo;对不起，您访问的博客地址不存在。&rdquo; 5. 文章内容可见，但关键字变成&ldquo;&times;&times;&times;&rdquo;。博客大巴和雅虎中国的独门绝技。实验者从新华网上原文粘贴了一篇胡锦涛谈论藏独问题的文章到博客大巴，结果&ldquo;胡锦涛&rdquo;就变成了&ldquo;&times;&times;&times;&rdquo;，是&ldquo;避讳神功&rdquo;第十八层的境界。 6. 博客发表，但中国大陆用户看不到。这是微软的&ldquo;龟息大法&rdquo;了。 可以看出，虽然宣宣是&ldquo;河蟹进行曲&rdquo;的总指挥，但各大高手的&ldquo;河 蟹之舞&rdquo;姿势各不相同。任何一个经济学研究者，如果能提出一套理论解释这种不同并且加以数据验证，那就一定会成为下一个Jesse Shapiro（芝加哥大学的年轻经济学家，刚三十岁。他将&ldquo;媒体偏见&rdquo;的研究带入了全新的境界）。...
]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.2129660.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:03:24 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
        <title>On Tibet and China</title>
        <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1917141.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I got this off Jason&rsquo;s Facebook note:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This is from Brendon Zhang&rsquo;s note which shows a poem written by one Chinese person&rsquo;s questions for the western world.</p>
<p>What do you want from Us?<br />
A Poem Dedicated to the last 150 years of this planet.</p>
<p>By a Slient, Silent Chinese.</p>
<p>When We were called Sick man of Asia, We were called The Peril.<br />
When We are billed to be the next Superpower, We are called The threat. When We closed our doors, You smuggled Drugs to Open Markets.<br />
When We Embrace Freed Trade, You blamed us for Taking away your jobs. When We were falling apart, You marched in your troops and wanted your fair share.<br />
When We were putting the broken pieces together again, Free Tibet you screamed, it was an invasion! ( When Woodrow Wilson Couldnt give back Birth Place of Confucius back to Us, But He did buy a ticket for the Famine Relief Ball for us.)<br />
So, We Tried Communism, You hated us for being Communists.<br />
When We embrace Capitalism, You hate us for being Capitalist.<br />
When We have a Billion People, you said we were destroying the planet.<br />
When We tried to limit our numbers, you said It was human rights abuse.</p>
<p>When We were Poor, You think we are dogs.<br />
When We Loan you cash, You blame us for your debts.<br />
When We build our industries, You called us Polluters.<br />
When we sell you goods, You blame us for global warming.<br />
When We buy oil, You called that exploitation and Genocide.<br />
When You fight for oil, You called that Liberation.<br />
When We were lost in Chaos and rampage, You wanted Rules of Law for us. When We uphold law and order against Violence, You called that Violating Human Rights.<br />
When We were silent, You said you want us to have Free Speech.<br />
When We were silent no more, You say we were Brainwashed-Xenophoics.</p>
<p>Why do you hate us so much? We asked.<br />
No, You Answered, We dont hate You.<br />
We dont Hate You either, But Do you understand us?<br />
Of course We do, You said, We have AFP, CNN and BBC<br />
What do you really want from us?<br />
Think Hard first</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My comment on there was that generally, people wanting to be in your position will try to knock you off that position with ridiculous allegations. People who are secretly doing what you&rsquo;re doing, will try to detract attention from themselves by placing the negative spotlight on you.</p>
<p>Chinese human rights violations? Hey, how about Abu Ghabi prison and other US soldier attrocities?</p>
<p>China used to bomb Tibetan temples? Doesn&rsquo;t the US bomb mosques and homes fairly frequently these days?</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m not a big supporter of bombing Tibetan temples, nor am I am advocate of destroying mosques and homes.</p>
<p>However, one thing sticks out: It&rsquo;s always about propaganda. The problem here, is the title of the poem.</p>
<p>&ldquo;by a Silent, Silent Chinese&rdquo;</p>
<p>The Chinese just don&rsquo;t care about what people say or think, and forge along on their own path. The United States and Western world, however, make sure every negative scenerio is deflected off them and every positive moment lasts for as long as it can.</p>
<p>It is not that either is completely right or wrong. Both countries have their good and their bad but while one just doesn&rsquo;t care and forges ahead, the other tries to control public perception.</p>
<p>It is intriguing how people &ldquo;blame the press&rdquo; for exaggerating stories and portraying China in a negative light. I have always been taught that the press &ldquo;is the eyes and ears of the public&rdquo;. We generally just report on what we see.</p>
<p>As for those pro-Chinese people who blame the press for the &ldquo;Free Tibet&rdquo; issue going out of hand, think about it from this perspective: the &ldquo;Free Tibet&rdquo; movement is a lot more eye catching. Someone geting beat up at the &ldquo;Free Tibet&rdquo; rally is a lot more emotional than a bunch of people standing around waving Chinese flags.</p>
<p>A &ldquo;Free Tibet&rdquo; rally is more emotional than a pro-Chinese movement at the moment it happens and when publiczed to the world, it will carry that emotion. Granted too that pro-Tibet demonstrations vastly outnumber pro-Chinese ones, the media will focus it&rsquo;s lenses on that movement.</p>
<p>Last is my answer to the question that the poem above ended with: &ldquo;What do you really want from us? Think hard first.&rdquo;</p>
<p>When people think say &ldquo;I have a problem with you doing X.&rdquo; If X is the real problem, then when you come to a solution, a compromise, or stop doing X, then the conflict should be resolved.</p>
<p>On the other hand, like in the poem, people come to you saying they have a problem with &ldquo;X&rdquo;. Then when you talk to them and arrive at a solution &ldquo;Y&rdquo;, they publicly say that you&rsquo;re not doing the &ldquo;right thing&rdquo; with solution &ldquo;Y&rdquo;.</p>
<p>So you think hard and ask them to think hard what do they actually want? Afterall, this is probably a mis-communication. They then talk to you privately, so as not to cause a scene, that perhaps solution &ldquo;Z&rdquo; would be the best of all.</p>
<p>Finally, after solution &ldquo;Z&rdquo; is implemented, they announce to the world through the media that you&rsquo;re the evil of the world because solution &ldquo;X&rdquo; is the way it should be.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the &ldquo;silent silent Chinese&rdquo; simply sits there scratching his head, wondering what went wrong with this &ldquo;peaceful, discreet&rdquo; solution? They ask &ldquo;what do they really want from us?&rdquo;</p>
<p>That situation really gives you the truthful answer to that question &ldquo;What do you really want from us? Think hard first.&rdquo;</p>
<p>China is the world&rsquo;s largest population, with one of the cheapest labour costs. They are an economic dragon waking up in the far east. Their military might, while currently inferior to the United States, grows rapidly. They are one of the biggest creditors, while the United States is in debt.</p>
<p>Contrary to the writer&rsquo;s request, they have thought hard. The answer is simply this.</p>
<p>&ldquo;You are in a postion that I want to be, or you are in a position to catch up and surpass me. So I will use propaganda to force you aside, because I want to be the only one on top and in first place.&rdquo;</p>...
]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1917141.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:04:30 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
        <title>Light the passion, share the dream</title>
        <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1917139.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img border="0" alt="" src="http://node3.foto.ycstatic.com/200804/20/9/25841897.jpg" /></p>...
]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1917139.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:04:33 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
        <title>Joyeux Noël</title>
        <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1827254.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[<img width="700" border="0" alt="" src="http://node1.foto.ycstatic.com/200712/26/1/6739233.jpg" />...
]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1827254.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:12:43 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
        <title>Through The Light</title>
        <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1803957.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[<img width="700" border="0" alt="" src="http://node0.foto.ycstatic.com/200711/18/e/6720382.jpg" />...
]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1803957.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:11:06 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
        <title>The Simpsons Go To Paris</title>
        <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1790382.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[<img height="416" width="600" border="0" alt="" src="http://node2.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/28/8/6767128.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<img width="600" border="0" alt="" src="http://node3.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/28/0/6734592.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<img width="600" border="0" alt="" src="http://node1.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/28/a/6708314.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<img width="600" border="0" alt="" src="http://node1.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/28/d/6708237.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<img border="0" alt="" src="http://node2.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/28/8/6745176.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<img width="600" border="0" alt="" src="http://node3.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/28/e/6713550.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<img width="600" border="0" alt="" src="http://node3.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/28/c/6753436.jpg" /><br />
<br />...
]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1790382.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:10:50 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
        <title>「森の時計」</title>
        <link>http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1787669.html</link>
        <description><![CDATA[<img height="525" alt="" width="700" border="0" src="http://node2.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/24/6/6745974.jpg" /><br />
<img alt="" width="700" border="0" src="http://node1.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/24/9/6728425.jpg" /><br />
<img alt="" width="700" border="0" src="http://node3.foto.ycstatic.com/200710/24/9/6723721.jpg" /><br />
<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;...
]]></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://michaelqian.ycool.com/post.1787669.html</guid>
        <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:10:22 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>
    </channel>
  </rss>
